If your arguments feel unsatisfying, they may need a little beefing up.
If you find yourself on a plane that is showing Judd Apatow’s film This is Forty, beware that watching it may actually make the plane ride feel longer, which seems impossible, given that it stars the delightful Paul Rudd.
Why do I mention this? Because it contains a scene in which the protagonist couple tries to fight correctly, like his therapist taught him and his wife. They begin their communication with "I" statements, followed by feelings: "I feel sad when you lie to me." Then, like good communication students, they pause, supposedly listen, and retort: "I feel scared when you overreact." However, the structure quickly devolves into name calling and other therapeutically formatted attacks, e.g. "I feel you are an ass****."
Why, when they followed the rules, was their fighting still so mean?
Because what each partner wanted, more than peaceful and clear communication, was to tear the other's head off. When the aggressive impulse is lurking and leading underneath the content, no well-meaning model of communication stands a chance.
Although using "I" statements, Imago and other models of "good" communication can be an important part of a well-balanced repertoire, I generally refer to programmed models of communicating as "lowfat communication." Low- or non-fat foods are packaged to be good for you, when in actuality, the lack of fat (which in some cases is arguably good for you, but that's another blogger's cross to bear), is compensated for with toxic additives. What is sold as nutritious can still be deadly.
What is so complicated about mastering conflict is that aggression cannot be cut out of the equation. Like all types of fat, all types of aggression are not bad for you. Some types are useful and actually healthy, and other types, such as blame and violence, are lethal. When you try to remove all aggression via healthier means of communication, as in processed lowfat foods, what is being avoided will be compensated for in passive and toxic ways.
More than correct format, effective communication requires that each person in a relationship know when their switch has been flipped and their desire to hurt, for protective or other reasons, has been activated. When the need to attack is present and overrides all other forces, it is extremely challenging to achieve self-control and make responsible choices.
I invite myself and my clients to become familiar with their aggression through simple questions:
- What does my body feel like when I want to attack or blame?
- What happens to my heart?
- What happens to the tone or quality of my voice?
A large degree of emotional sophistication needs to be present in order to detect aggression within and make the "right" choices around it.
Most people do not want to acknowledge their aggressive and destructive impulses because they are painful to bear witness to. "Not me! I am not angry," they say, and in so doing, they cut themselves off from the very knowledge that will teach them about their sensitivities, their boundaries and their power. They may look at the characters on the screen or at the table next to them and say, "I would never act like that." Then when they unconsciously slide into tantrums in the boardroom or the bedroom, their judgments render them blind to their own out-of-control behaviors. Such people will never fight fair. You cannot refrain from acting on a vicious impulse if you cannot admit that you have one.
Sometimes, as in the following example, giving way to aggression can be authentic and effective. I recently worked with an executive whose biggest fear was being accused of being a bitch. She was so disciplined and careful about not raising her voice or escalating with her staff that she went on frequent walks around the block and trips to the ladies room in an effort to diffuse her activated emotions. Her staff jokingly referred to it as her "time out."
But there came a time when one of her directors pushed her too far. After being chided repeatedly for lateness or outright absence at important meetings, he lost his phone around the same time as an important deadline, but never told her. He was largely responsible for most of the presentation content, but was unreachable. His laissez-faire attitude about important issues had crossed a line and she was sick of managing it. When he flippantly defended himself on the matter, she authorized herself to give it to him. Somehow, after all these years of good behavior, she let her anger out full force, even in front of a few others. Miraculously, it was the right move. It finally alerted him to the impact he was having on the whole office, and others were relieved as well. People showed her respect. He was indignant at first, but quickly straightened up.
Because it has been a large part of the subject of my Relationship as a Team series, I have been rightly accused of "focusing a lot on fighting." I stand by my belief that since conflict is an inevitable and healthy part of a working team, paying enough attention to master it is a worthy persuit.
So here's what I want to say to you as you learn to fight fair: Give yourself a break. Eat some real fat. Give your humanity, of which aggression is an irrepressible force, back to yourself. Learning how to fight well is a long journey, with many road bumps along the way, in which you will get lost, foggy, bruised, and yes, on occasion, even mean. In fact, it often takes a period of training to master.
Let's hope the casualties are few and far between. And remember, love yourself, no matter what.
More effective communication advice from YourTango: