Why Elizabeth Hurley's Bikini Line For Girls Is Sick And Wrong

eliabeth hurley bikini line for girls
Family, Self

A bikini that's described as "great for girls who want to look grown up" is wildly inappropriate.

Mommy wars cover a wide range of very serious topics such as breastfeeding vs bottle feeding, natural birth vs medicated birth and co-sleeping vs cry-it-out. I'm not here to talk about any of those. Refreshing right?

Though there does seem to be yet another, less-detrimental-to their-well-being divide among moms of young girls: bikini vs one-piece swimsuits.

I fall into the latter camp and sometimes it certainly feels like I'm the only one. Come April, stores are flooded with summer clothing, and among them, tons of bikinis for babies, toddlers and tweens. Most of the time, the one-piece suits or tankinis aren't any better. Between low-cut halter necklines and even lower-slung waistlines, it is not easy to find modest, functional swimwear for little ladies.

This week, HuffPost Parents reported on actress and model Elizabeth Hurley's new line of swimsuits for young girls. Pieces like the "Mini Cha Cha Bikini," an animal-print two-piece for girls under 8 and the "Collete Bikini," a suit that is held together by a gold ring and meant specifically for girls ages 8-13, have caused quite a stir in the UK. One suit is even described by the brand as "great for girls who want to look grown up." 10 Smart Ways To Keep Your Kids From Growing Up Too Fast

Not surprisingly, some moms and members of the media are concerned about the sexualization of our children, stating that the styles make girls look like mini-strippers. Take one look at some of the barely there suits and it's hard to disagree. Not to mention, your family's sunscreen costs will skyrocket thanks to all that extra exposed skin. 

I have several reasons for not wanting my young daughter wearing bikinis. The simplest one is that they are not functional. Swimsuits are for swimming and playing in the water. Olympic swimmers wear sporty, one-piece bathing suits; Victoria's Secret models wear leopard print bikinis. If we agree that bikinis are all about style—sexy style—at that, then it's hard to justify letting a young girl wear one. You don't wear a bikini to become a world class swimmer, you wear one to look sexy on the beach. Or, as Ms. Hurley's camp believes, if you want to look more grown up.

Parents will argue that bikinis are easier for bathroom breaks. That's why I think that tankinis are a great option. The best option for modesty being a two-piece suit where the bottom of the top meets to the top of the bottom, and fits snug like a tank top. I'm not talking about a midriff-baring, sexy halter here. Is Facebook Turning Girls Into Porn Stars?

Another argument says that being "anti-bikini" means you think that babies and young girls can look sexy, so you are actually the weird one. My opinion on this won't be popular: I truly think babies look ridiculous in bikinis. They actually look much sweeter wearing just a diaper and a hat, lounging under an umbrella, than wearing some teeny, tiny baby bikini.

More juicy content from YourTango: