I have found that I write the best when someone has either pissed me off or amazed me with their sheer stupidity. In this case, it was sheer stupidity, unfortunately. I was browsing through the Q&A section of the site when I stumbled upon a question by some blatant retard who wondered if there was some kind of anatomy difference between big women and slim women that caused the larger of the two to be really “horny” and “freaky.” Initially, I wondered just how big of a dumbass actually pondered whether the anatomy of two women was different, but after staring at this geniuses reference to women who were “9’s” and “10’s” I made the assumption that this guy’s elevator didn’t come close to the top floor. However, the two women who responded to the dumbest question of 2010 (so far) might actually be more ignorant than the winner who posted it. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
So, without further ado, meet LAWestphal, a self-proclaimed chicken legged, less than a “10,” who claims to have been married for 23 years. She says, “Large women, like large men, have a lot more 'junk' in the way, and um....no offense....many men are not...ummm...'big' enough in the first, or knowledgable enough on how to use it, to make it around, in past, the largness”
So, our friend LA thinks that big women have too much meat on their bones (that apparently gets “in the way”) and that men aren’t well endowed enough or don’t have enough expertise to get “around” whatever the hell “largness” is.
Now, here are some more utterly ridiculous claims from LA, “The people I know, not DH, who are XXXlarge say that the way they are treated by people is that most think they are easy deprived pickings.