She does sound crazy, but I couldn't really take a side with this until hearing her part of the story. I don't see how he could go 2 weeks without getting in touch with her at lest once in some way, and if she was friends with his Mom then I'm surprised she didn't call Mom first to find out if he was alright.
For now I'll keep the fence warm.
That's what I mean about the generations. I can imagine being on a two-week vacation and not trying to get in touch with a boyfriend/girlfriend (though a wife is different, of course!). You might not be near a phone or the long distance call might not be affordable. E-mail didn't exist. So the only thing you could do was send a letter or postcard. That was a sign of true love, but you might not even get the letter before your honey came back. Even not sending a letter could be forgiven if the traveller got busy or weren't sure what to say.
Of course, the girlfriend thought her guy was at home and just not answering her calls for some mysterious reason. Another generational difference - if I'd wanted to screen my calls I would have had to answer the phone and pretend I was someone else. So if your honey never answered the phone for a few days, you would have assumed that either something was wrong with the phone, the guy was dying, or the guy wasn't at home.
I get what you're saying. I grew up right alongside AOL and emailing, but i didn't really start doing that until my early 20s. Now I'd rather email than call most times, but that is only for work. I still write letters and send them the snail mail way occasionally as they are always fun, but I can't imagine not speaking with my GF at least once while I away for a couple weeks, and I'd definitely be sending postcards.
She sounds insane, even if he didn't tell her where he was going.
My reaction is probably coming from the un-connected generation where you couldn't always reach someone. And if you were worried about someone, you tried other ways to reach them like going to their house or calling a friend.


