Okay...any guy can pretty much vouch already for the fact that yes, if you keep your hands off of yourself AND don't get any for awhile then there is an increased load. Otherwise, if you're the single handy-man with a nightly ritual or a Don Juan with frequent partnering then you'll have a way lighter load, kinda like the difference between a super-soaker and a 50 cent squirt gun. Okay, maybe a super-soaker is a bit much, but you get the point.
I get the feeling, much like BookMama, that these poor scientists are somewhat socially inept and possibly ashamed of taking things into their own hands. Or as the extension of BookMama's thought.
Really don't get how a hot chick means a guy will put out his best swimmers though...
Scientists claim beautiful women should sleep with ugly men now? Just might make you think the scientists were male - and ugly ones at that. Especially since they have no evidence, just a thought problem.
So male animals have a higher sperm count if they haven't come in a while - could that just be the way things work? Like if you hold your pee in longer, the color is darker. And if you come more often, the sperm is better quality. Not everything in nature is an evolutionary strategy.
And why do we think humans have the same evolutionary strategy as other animals? Biting our mates' heads off after sex doesn't work for humans. Neither does having sex with a lot of women who wouldn't be able to raise the kid without help - and the women might not even be ovulating. my opinion - http://www.yourtango.com/200922928/are-men-programmed-cheat?lid=gofromhe...
Seems to me the logical thing for human males would be to produce more sperm when they were in love and knew the woman was faithful.



