YourTango is your community for love, sex, dating, and relationship advice. Community | Feedback
User login
  1. I forgot my password!
Logging you in, please wait...
Login Sign Up

Recap: Dating Boot Camp & The Man Panel: Part 1

What went down at Matt Titus and Tamsen Fadal's first 2 dating boot camps.

As some of you possibly know, I had the pleasure of being part of Matt Titus and Tamsen Fadal's Dating Boot Camp (it was four weeks of tough, tough love). I was the guy that you didn't want to date (for myriad reasons). Just kidding, I was on a their panel of men (a man panel, if you will). It was our task to take questions from the ladies, ponder for three seconds and echo what Matt and Tamsen  just said. Just kidding, we were there to give brutally honest and/ or hilarious answers to questions small and large.

As far as Matt and Tamsen go, they started from the beginning with the "enemy": men folk. Just kidding. No one's really anyone's enemy up in h're [sic], it's just that the behavior of the opposite sex is sometimes wholly incomprehensible to the point that we seem alien to each other (or something). The point was to educate women to the different kind of "players" on the field (player as in playa and field as in "love is a battlefield"). Many of these men are (wait for the shocking part) are just on the prowl for easy sex and are willing to move on to the next thing if there's no connection. Some of them (us) are just really sly about it (evidently, that's what some people call "nice guys" and other call "pansies"). 

For this reason, Matt and Tamsen embrace a 90-day rule. Per the policy, penetrative intercourse is to be abstained from for 90 days from the first date (the first date counts as day one). Outer-course is inbounds. The man panel (this week consisting of Adam Rich, Thrillist.com, Ted Scofield, SexySlang.com, Michael Somerville, MichaelSomerville.com, Max Gross, From Schlub To Stud, and some Tom Miller guy) groaned a bit at this one but was quickly whipped back into obedience by electrodes attached to our undercarriages. Just kidding, they attached the electrodes to our prostates (which roughly 10% of enjoyed). My new homey, LostPlum, sort of digs waiting. Though sexual compatibility ranks high on her list of important stuff, the first time with someone is supposed to be memorable. The best question from the audience was from a septuagenarian and she wondered how to get men 40 years her junior into committed relationships. Everyone is still a little uncomfortable from that one.

Week two was all about the look men love. Matt and Tamsen, both charming good-lookers, know that men are very interested in physical attraction (to get the ball rolling) and need that hook right off-the-bat. For this reason, they insist that women drop the frumpy and get with the plump-y. Just kidding, that doesn't mean anything. They just know that a man's eyes are connected to his groin and his groin has a secure line to his metaphorical heart.

Can you relate?

Discussion

BookMama Married Happily Married
Posted June 20, 2009

I'm still pondering the 90-day rule. I thought Simone Grant's reaction was funny but a little cold (basically, no way, I'm not going to waste 90 days on a guy before I know if he can bonk properly). More like test-driving a car than having a relationship with another human being.

On the other hand, is a set timeline really necessary? Is this the only way to avoid having sex with someone who doesn't care about you and then feeling hurt? Or is it that if you don't see someone that often, it takes 90 days to get to know them?

And are there any other rules that go with it? Does he have to be in love with you or going out with you before you have sex? Just having a timelimit doesn't seem like enough for me.

So would anyone out there really follow this rule?

Score: 0

You need to be logged in to do that!

Login or sign up now - it's fun, easy, and free. We'll keep your seat warm for you!
SimoneGrant Single Still kissing frogs
Posted June 21, 2009

Yes, it's exactly like test driving a car. A car is a big purchase/investment and a pretty big decision (for most people). I certainly wouldn't buy or lease one without taking it for a test drive. Likewise, I'm not going to invest deeply in a relationship unless I've given the guy a thorough test drive.

Having been in the heartbreaking situation of being in a relationship with a man I cared deeply for, but with whom I was not sexually compatible, I know that caring about a person does not automatically make your sex life work. For me, three months is too much time to invest in a relationship without knowing that the sex is going to be good. I want to tick that box off earlier, rather than later.

Score: 0
BookMama Married Happily Married
Posted June 22, 2009

But it seems like this puts a lot of pressure on people to perform well in bed before they know each other very well. Can't people learn to please each other? And will you really know if you're sexually compatible even if you have a good time?

Score: 0

Join the Discussion!

Login or sign up now - it's fun, easy, and free. We'll keep your seat warm for you!

Custom Newsletter 2

Recommended for You

Login or Sign Up for a personalized YouTango experience.
See all or Ask your own question!