Sure, it's an expression of commitment, but not necessarily the level of commitment that warrants the tag "engagement 2.0." You can be in a relationship that's not exclusive and still have the level of trust and intimacy in which you both decide to safely lose the latex. I'm living that now. We both love each other, we both were tested for STDs and we both trust that if the other gets down and dirty with someone else they'll take every precaution to protect our mutual health.
Really folks, the notion that ALL love is all-or-nothing is so antiquated. There are many equally valid relationship paradigms in society beyond the monogamist tradition.
Don't confuse the level of trust that you, yourself, need with what the level is or should be for everyone. People often project their own feelings as a standard for society et al.
Well, I think the level of trust needed to not use a condom with someone isn't just a subjective thing. You're putting your life in their hands. It doesn't mean you want to marry them, but you should be able to trust them just as much as a fiancee.
Throw in that your partner is planning to sleep with other people but have the self-control to practice safe sex, and you need to be able to trust them at an incredibly high level.
I think bareback sex is absolutely an expression of commitment. What concerns me more is how many women assume monogamy and exclusivity and don't explicitly communicate that that's what they want. Too often, women assume monogamy because we want to believe we have that kind of relationship. Or the man tells them they're not looking for a relationship at that point and the woman still continues to sleep with the man in hopes he'll eventually change his mind. This "intense sitdown" HAS to come once a true level of consistency and trust and comfort has been established and women need to be sure to clear up any gray area surrounding exclusivity. I get advice requests from women all the time who are too afraid to do this and end up being emotionally crushed or worse.



