Monogamy Is Good, And It's Here To Stay
Open marriage is not the way of the future, and that's a good thing.

Another reason why open relationships don't work in practice for a lot of women is because they're simply too time-consuming. Block is up front about the work involved in juggling a husband and a girlfriend. An excerpt of her book on Huffingtonpost.com, "Life In An Open Marriage: The Four (Not-So-Easy) Steps" (also excerpted on YourTango), prompted one HuffPo commenter to say, "I'm exhausted just reading about all the 'work' and never-ending 'communication' about feelings, situations, jealousy, worry, etc. It all sounds like much more effort than its worth (IMO)." Likewise, Taormino's Opening Up: A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships is an intimidating 300 pages, in which the kind of person who is successful at non-monogamy is described as someone committed to knowing themselves "on a deep level," a process she says might include "psychotherapy and counseling, reading, writing, journaling, blogging, attending workshops and peer support groups, meditation, and various spiritual practices." While the idea of openness may be appealing to some women, it's hard to imagine many of us finding the time to juggle a second relationship. Especially those of us with careers and children.
Open relationships are being billed as the wave of the future, but they’ve actually gone in and out of style every few decades, never becoming more than a fringe movement. According to Susan Squire, author of I Don’t: A Contrarian History of Marriage, "there have been experiments of mate-swapping in the 19th century and again in the 70s and in a few Utopian societies, but it never seems to stick. It doesn't work or only works for a short period of time. Then, history cycles, marriage cycles, and everything repeats itself." The last time open marriages (often known as polyandry, free love, friends with benefits, et al) were in vogue was during the sexual revolution of the late sixties and seventies. In 1972, the landmark book Open Marriage, documented Nena and George O'Neill’s attempts to redefine marriage and open up their relationship to other partners. It was a runaway bestseller and, like today, promoted the impression that open marriages were the way of the future. By 1977, Nena O’Neill had published The Marriage Premise, which argued that fidelity was not such a bad thing after all. Squire herself got caught up in what she calls "the five minutes of open relationships" in the seventies. In her first marriage, she says, "we did this thing where we had to tell each other but we could f**k whoever we wanted. Did it work? No. I remember him calling me to tell me he was drinking with some woman, and saying 'I'm going to go sleep with some woman, do you mind?' Of course I minded. When faced with that, I wasn't into it. And the reverse was true as well."
Discussion

My DH and I have been married for 20+ years. Now we are empty nesters, but before we got married I made sure he understood my feelings about monogamy and marriage. I truly believe that marriage should be a 1 shot deal, and on that note, we agreed that it was each others responsibility to make each other sexually happy; for sex is a vital part of marriage.
We have an open marriage, are not committed to any type of defined lifestyle but our own. It has more to do with trust in one another to communicate desires and fantasies, to fulfill those said fantasies, and a "in love" bond-that you should have before you get married anyway. Having an open marriage should not be a fad, though I understand your reasoning. That is like saying in high school that "everyone else has a boyfriend so I need one". Yuck! Open marriage is a need to pleasure each other in every possible way. An acceptance and understanding of yourself, your mate, and what is right for your relationship. Not what society dictates is right.
There is not many sexual experiences that we have not done. We have a no list of things one or the other won't do, but can go else where to get; and we have a no list of things that are not allowed. An agreement if you will. Just as binding as our wedding certificate. We explore and research new ideas and knowledge of sex. Happily ever after is what we strive for. Not, happy and married for as long as.
Just My 2 cnts
LyndaW
This article reads like opinion being presented as fact. Not to mention, it's ultimately Cristina who walks away from the threesome in VCB, becoming bored with the sexual variation presented in that relationship. According to Cline, wouldn't the male typically quit the relationship and look elsewhere? Right. So, we can't put gendered behaviors in boxes.
i can see the pros and cons of open relationships but i think it's a huge over generalization to say that men would prefer multiple partners while most women would not. if it weren't for how we are socialized and all of the talking, journaling and psychotherapy involved, i am sure many more women would be up for it.

